Wednesday, February 28, 2007

Good News

Well I have some good news to brighten my days before my Vegas trip. I once again have the opportunity to go to New York, and this time it's on for sure. I'll be leaving next Tuesday night and coming back Sunday afternoon, which gives me time to see 6 shows. Those will most likely be Tarzan, Grey Gardens, Company, Curtains, The Drowsy Chaperone, and Spring Awakening. However, one or more of those may be replaced by A Chorus Line, The Apple Tree, or The Vertical Hour (although this one is very unlikely, I really only want to see it b/c Julianne Moore, and with my luck she'd be out sick the day I go). Also, Juan Diego Florez is giving a concert Saturday night at Carnegie Hall, and there's a chance I may forgo a show and see him instead, although my companion is adamantly opposed to that idea. He'll be in Chicago this time next year for Barber of Seville at the Lyric, so I will probably just wait and see him in that, and who knows, maybe he'll do a concert here in the meantime with the CSO. I just have to figure out how to do mobile blogging and I'll be posting reviews after each show. I just hope there's no more snowstorms in the forecast.

Grease

As you know, I didn't get to watch Grease on Sunday because while they think that no one would watch the show while the Superbowl was on, they apparently thought they wouldn't loose any of their audience if they were on during the Oscars. However, I have managed to secure some information before watching tomorrow's rerun on Bravo. Apparently only the girls sang (this format is getting more confusing by the week and it really seems like they're making it up as they go along), but they did kick off one guy and one girl, and those unlucky two were Kevin and Kate. I'm not surprised at all about Kevin. He was the least charismatic of the remaining contenders and his performance was by far the worst last week. I'm more surprised that Chad ended up in the bottom two, but it really was a tossup between him and Derek, and Derek's supporters got the votes in, although I wouldn't be surprised if it was a difference of less than 100 votes. Apparently viewers prefer a good save to a horrid start over a thoroughly mediocre performance. I'm much more surprised by Kate, especially since she specializes in good ends to poor starts, but she really didn't have much oomph to her either other than her big finishes. As I've said before, theatre goers aren't paying $111.25 just to hear the last note of each song done perfectly. I'm also again surprised by Kathleen being in the bottom 2 while Ashley's skated by each week even though she is so much worse than either of them. If she ends up the winner, not only am I not buying a ticket to the show, I'm not even buying the cast album. I have a concert to go to tomorrow night, so I won't get around to watching the show until sometime Friday. Look for my full thoughts on the show Friday evening or Saturday morning.

Tuesday, February 27, 2007

Countdown

5 months to go until Hairspray hits theaters!

Monday, February 26, 2007

The Oscars

Well, what a night. My official score is 6 for 8, not as good as last year (when I successfully predicted all 8 major categories and really would have liked to have been wrong on several of them), but much better than 1997, or really most of the last few years, in which I've gotten 4, maybe 5, correct. It was great to see Scorsese finally win, but I really thought the academy would take the chance to right two wrongs. Instead, they opted to fix one, and just up the IOU they handed O'Toole 40 years ago. I'm also, even though I loved Little Miss Sunshine, very pleased with the Best Picture pick. There was a lot of nay-saying going around that the Academy would be turned off by the gratuitous blood, gore, and profanity in the The Departed to give it the top prize. True, there is a lot of blood, gore, and profanity, but it is not gratuitous. It was integral to the story and played an important part, and I'm glad the academy was willing to look past the hype and see the movie for what it was (although an argument could be made that the academy loves seeing people killed in grusome ways but still can't stomach a love story between two cowboys). Plus, by giving Best Picture to The Departed, the academy put to rest any speculation that they really gave Scorcese the award as recognition for his body of work instead of for the movie he was nominated for. There were also naysayers proclaiming that The Departed really isn't his best movie and not even the best of the nominees, and that if Scorsese won, it would indeed be for his body of work, and that Best Picture would go to another movie. The academy decided to really make things up to Scorsese and knock that rumor down before it could really get started. It was a great cap to a mostly decent evening.

Ellen was a great host, but the show overall dragged, partly because they frontloaded it with all the technical awards. While it seemed like a good idea to let the suspense build, I think it works better to give a couple of the big ones up front (traditionally the supporting performance Oscars) and then go to the technical awards. Imagine this year, if they had opened the show with Alan Arkin's win, it really would have pumped some life into the proceedings. Instead, the show had to fight an uphill battle all night. I enjoyed the contortionist's representations of the major movies of the year, but once the show ran long, they should have just axed the remaining ones, they took up time without really adding anything substantive. Also, they knew Morricone was going to get an honorary Oscar. Could they not have arranged to have running subtitles for his acceptance speech instead of having Clint interrupt every few seconds to poorly translate what was said. It doubled the time needed for the segment and was painful to watch. Really, the people involved are responsible for the greatest on-screen magic and technical wonders, were subtitles really beyond their abilities? On a related note, in the future, any presenter who does not fully rehearse their lines should be axed from the show and replaced with a well-rehearsed understudy (and I'm talking about Eastwood, Ken Watanabe, and Kathryn Denueve). If Abigail Breslin and Will Smith's son can flawlessly pronounce the names of all the foreign short nominees, there's no excuse for the adults to hem and haw online while trying to spit out a half-baked joke or stumble over the names of the nominees. Then, nominees, no matter how much of a long shot you may be considered, please rehearse your speeches in advance, especially if English is your second language and you plan on giving your acceptance speech in English (and I'm talking to you, Miss Best Costume winner). Either rehearse it until you can give it in the shortest amount of time possible, or just give it in your native language, as a few of the winners very classily decided to do. Lastly, as awful as the Dreamgirls were (and kudos to the academy for giving Melissa Etheridge the Best Song Oscar), who the fuck invited Celine Dion??? I'm sure she needs to develop new revenue streams now that her Vegas show has less than a year to go, but this was not the place for her. And what was up with that face she made at the end of the song? It looked like she was getting collagen injected into her lips. It was by far the low point of the night. Next year, let's bring Ellen back, ax anything done by Will Ferrell, Jack Black, Ben Stiller, or any of their ilk, cut the video montages in half, and keep giving out awards to deserving winners, and we'll have a show.

Legends

On Saturday, I braved the cold, sleet, snow, and generally crappy weather and saw Legends! at the LaSalle Bank Theatre, which was more interesting than enjoyable. After such a horrible slog to get there, and then being stuck next to a very smelly patron (seriously people, if you know you're going to be going to the theatre, you might want to take a shower at least once in the preceding week), I really wanted, and needed to like it. I know the show's history, but I was also aware that now, even more than then, it really was a novelty act, with Joan Collins taking Carol Channing's role and Linda Evans taking Mary Martin's. Dynasty was somewhat before my time, but I do know that it was the show to see and that these two were indeed legends. I knew the novelty would quickly wear off but really hoped, given the show's history, that there would be something to sustain it. However, I found the show to be tame, contrived, and pretty toothless. I expected sharper barbs and wittier lines. The rivalry between the two actresses really wasn't that believable, and their fight at the end of act 1 was really staged. Nothing about the show really rang authentic, and the special brownie plot point in act 2 really seemed out of place. Collins and Evans did well, but the real highlight of the show was Tonye Patano. I love Weeds and she always steals every scene she's in (as Haylia, Mary Louise Parker's supplier), and it was great to see her in a similar, but just different enough to be new, role. It's worth seeing, but if all the empty seats were any indication, not at the prices they're charging.

Friday, February 23, 2007

The Big Ones

And we're down to the top two. One's fairly certain, one is wide open. Just like Idol results night, there's going to be way too much filler to get to this point, and anything can happen.

Best Director: The most anticipated event in Oscar history. How will it play out?
Will Win: I'm not completely convinced it's going to happen, but I will go out on a limb and predict that this will finally be Martin Scorsese's year. The Departed was a great movie, while his last two nominations (The Aviator and Gangs of New York) were not. This is his first deserving nomination since The Last Temptation of Christ (and while we're at it, he's been unfairly ignored even more than he's been unfairly nominated; Alice Doesn't Live Here Any More Taxi Driver, Cape Fear, Casino, and Kundun all should have brought him nominations), and a return to the genre he's reputed to do best (see my previous parenthetical discussion), and add the chance to right a longstanding wrong, and these could equal a win. However, there are still a lot of hurdles. There's a lot of sentiment for Paul Greengrass, and Scorsese could fall victim to the Brokeback/Crash effect (also known as the Bacall/Binoche effect): so many people think he could win that they will vote for their favorite "underdog" and one of the nominees could end up with one or two more votes and take the trophy. There's a real chance that could happen here, and while Greengrass may be the most likely beneficiary (for United 93), there's a great chance it could go to Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu (for Babel), or even Clint Eastwood (again) for Letters from Iwo Jima. The only one guaranteed not to win is Stephen Frears. The Queen has been criticized within the academy for seeming too much like a BBC America made for TV movie rather than a feature film. I'll be on my seat with the rest of the country as this envelope is opened. It's still anyone's guess.

Should Win: Some critics (namely Roger Ebert) have opted out of naming their personal favorite out of respect for Scorsese, but since when has that been a concern for me? I would like to see Paul Greengrass take this one. He did such a great job with a very sensitive topic, and managed to make us forget for 93 minutes what was going to happen to the titled airplane. United 93's been shut out of most major awards, although it did win one early critic's association award for Best Picture, and this win would make up for a lot.

Should Have Been Nominated: All the nominees here are strong and deserve their nomination, but like the Original Screenplay category, there's a 6th equally deserving nominee that it would have been nice to see here: Edward Zick for Blood Diamond. Ebert best described the movie as "controlled chaos" and as the director, Zwick masterfully controlled the chaos into a well done movie. His name should be up there too.

Should Not Have Been Nominated: None. They are all fine choices, and even if Scorsese doesn't win, any winner will truly deserve it.

Best Picture
Will Win: I'm going out on another limb and saying Little Miss Sunshine. Comedies don't do well at the Oscars, but this one has really tapped into something. Everyone loves it, and it's a great opportunity to reassert Sundance's legitimacy after years of highly hyped Sundance products fizzling in the mass market. Plus, it won the SAG award, just as Crash did last year. If it won that one with enough of a margin, the actors could have the final say again this year.

Should Win: Little Miss Sunshine. While it would be nice to have our first Asian Language (or for that matter, any foreign language) Best Picture winner, and while I loved The Departed, this one is by far my favorite of the bunch. It was hearwarming without being cloying. It retold a familiar tale without being cliched. I laughed my ass off at the end. What's not to love?

Shoudl Have Been Nominated: Again, with 5 such deserving nominees, I can't begrudge any of them, but I really would have like to see United 93 in this category. Other than Iwo Jima, the other four films have gotten so much exposure and have all won so many awards, it would have been nice, in a Crash kind of way, for United 93 to have been allowed to share in some of the glory.

Should Not Have Been Nominated: Again, none. They are all solid choices and I'll be happy to see any of them win. This has been the greatest year for movies in a long time (I know, I said that last year, but this year managed to surpass last year's bumper crop of Brokeback, Munich, History of Violence, Junebug, and Match Point), and for the first time in an even longer time, I'm not pissed off about any of the nominees. Let's pop the champagne and watch how this plays out.

Leading Performances

Best Actress: What a great category this year. Other than Kate Winselt (normally a fine actress, if you dont' count Titanic, but this movie unsettles me, and not in the way they intended), I would be happy with a win by anyone.

Will Win: The only real sure thing of the night, Helen Mirren. Just like Jennifer Hudson, she's won every award leading up to tonight, but unlike Hudson, the academy usually does not use this category to award something other than the nominee (with Halle Berry being the exception that proves the rule). It's true, the academy does like to award physical transformations over true acting in this category, but even there, Mirren has this one sewn up. An upset here would be more shocking than Crash, Juliette Binoche, Marissa Tomei, and Adrian Bordy put together.

Should Win: Judi Dench. She's been unfairly overlooked here several times, and this performance ranks head and shoulders above anything she's been nominated for in the past. In any other year, just like some of our other nominees, she'd be the winner. She made such a nasty woman totally sympathetic and managed to make us forget any concerns about the "predatory lesbian" image the character could have projected in lesser hands.

Should Have Been Nominated: Toni Collete. What is the academy's deal with her? Sure she got nominated for The Sixth Sense (and should have won), but she was ignored for Muriel's Wedding and Japanese Story (both of which she won her native Australia's Oscar-equivalent for), and now she's ignored again. Goddammit academy, get with it and give this woman her due already.

Should Not Have Been Nominated: Love her, loved the movie, but was Meryl Streep really the leading actress in Prada? This was a very lightweight role, and in a year that saw such meaty roles for women, I can't believe this was really one of the five best. Meryl is overdue for another Oscar, but if she gets it for this, she'll be the Marissa Tomei of leading actresses; no one will ever take this category seriously again.

Best Actor: Another category that's not such a lock upon closer examination.
Will Win: Peter O'Toole. Yes, Forrest Whittaker has won every award up to this point, but I think we're going to see a repeat of2002, and even 1989. In both those years, front runners swept most pre-Oscar awards, but that was because no one really bothered watching The Pianist or My Left Foot until after the Oscar Nominations were announced, and Brody and Day-Lewis swept up from behind to claim the award. Reportedly, the same thing is happening this year. According to inside sources, no one really bothered with Venus until O'Toole's Oscar nomination, and now it's getting a lot of talk from within the Academy. He also has the benefit of the Scorsese effect. He's another perennial underdog about to set a record for the most losses, and voters, after checking off Scorsese for director will probably want to set another score straight and check off O'Toole. They can right two wrongs in one night, that will do a lot to make up for last year. If one wins, they both will win, but if one loses, they both will lose.

Should Win: Despite my sentimental attachment to O'Toole, this award should go to Leonardo DiCaprio. He's worked hard to get past the Titanic stigma, and his hard work pays off in Blood Diamond. It's a great role, and he handles all of his scenes well. He manages to be an action star, romantic lead, redeemed scoundrel, and anti-social criminal all at once. He ran the table and scored every time. He's been ignored for some of his best work and nominated for one of his worst (The Aviator), it would be nice to see the Academy really get this one right.

Should Have Been Nominated: Aaron Eckhart for Thank You For Smoking. The film overall was shallow and slick (and again, not in the way it was intended to be), but he was so memorable and pitch perfect, he gave the film whatever moral high ground it had. He's another actor that's been criminally overlooked by the academy, and his streak continues. At least Susan Lucci got nominations.

Should Not Have Been Nominated: Will Smith. What the fuck? He's a good actor, and from all accounts a really decent guy, but why nominate him for The Pursuit of Happyness? It was a weak, shallow, preachy movie, and as I just mentioned, Aaron Eckhart did a much better job rising above preachy and shallow than Smith did here. He got this because Hollywood loves him as a person, not for his performance, and hopefully, the nomination will be seen as enough.

Supporting Performances

One of these categories is not as locked up as it may seem. It's rare to get both wins from the same movie, and historically, the academy loves upsetting the supporting actress front runner (just ask Judy Davis and Lauren Bacall). However, ever since Juliette Benoche upset Lauren Bacall (which in part led me to predict Julianne Moore to win over front runner and ultimate winner Kim Basinger the next year), the academy has done a better job of ensuring that the front runners win (Jennifer Connelly, Catherine Zeta-Jones), with only one upset since (in 2000 when Marcia Gay Harden beat Kate Hudson). I think the academy will hold to its recent pattern here, in an unfortunate loss for good taste.

Best Supporting Actress:
Will Win: Jennifer Hudson. She's won every award, and while most critics groups don't have voting academy members, she has also won most guild awards and the SAG award, indicating a strong following that should lead to a win here. The only thing that may stop her is the Academy's penchant to use this category to reward a relatively unknown nominee from an underlooked film. (Marissa Tomei, Mira Sorvino, and Marcia Gay Harden all benefited from this). While none of the nominees this year can be classifed as both unknown and from an underlooked film, three of them fall into at least one of those categories. Adriana Barraza and Rinko Kikuchi are both unknown, but Babel is hardly overlooked. Cate Hudson is known, but Notes on a Scandal didn't quite get its due this year. However, she has an Oscar in this category, and probably won't win again after just 2 years. Abigail Breslin is out of luck. After Anna Paquin's horrid acceptance speech, the academy has seemed to ban young winners. Then, there's no denying that while Dreamgirls has the most nominations, it could be considered overlooked since it was locked out of most other major categories, which works to Jennifer's favor. If there's going to be an upset, I predict Rinko Kikuchi, but I think Hudson will take it.

Should Win: Abigail Breslin. Any 10 year old that can pull of that dance deserves this award. Then there's the bedtime scene with Alan Arkin. She showed more depth of emotion than Jennifer Hudson ever did. Plus, a win for just her second big picture would really stick it to that Fanning bitch.

Should Have Been Nominated: Vera Farmiga. As the love interest and significant plot point in The Departed, she remained understated yet unwavering as the film's moral core. In the hands of a lesser actress this would have been an overwraught, self-indulgent performance. She brought it to life and made the character resonate. She's only one of several puzzling acting omissions from this great movie.

Should Not Have Been Nominated: No surprise here for any of my loyal readers, it's Jennifer Hudson. Read any of my numerous previous posts on Dreamgirls for my reasons.

Best Supporting Actor:
Will Win: In the first upset of the night, this one will go to Alan Arkin. Most of the major players from Little Miss Sunshine were snubbed, and with Abigail Breslin guaranteed to lose, the Academy will feel a need to recognize someone from the ensemble, especially to justify the other awards this one will win. Eddie Murphy just didn't cut it. The character was not a stretch for him despite the media trying to label it as such to create a comeback story to go hand in hand with Jennifer Hudson's Cinderella story. Plus, Murphy had the misfortune to see Norbit come out just as Alan Arkin's star was starting to rise (with his comeback story rivaling anything printed about Murphy's), which happened at just the time voters were receiving their ballots. That's going to come back to haunt him and Arkin will take it.

Should Win: Alan Arkin. No contest here. Great performance, great movie, great backstory, he deserves it.

Should Have Been Nominated: Jan Vlasak, for his creepy, understated performance in Hostel. This is a long shot, even by my standards of wishful thinking (again, predicted Titanic backlash). The academy generally despises horror movies, with only Rosemary's Baby, The Exorcist, Misery, and Silence of the Lambs getting major awards, and only Silence taking Best Picture. Then, there was the firestorm of controversy around Hostel; it was reputed to be sadistic, graphic, disgusting, morally repugnant. Bullshit. Hostel is by far the best post 9-11 horror movie to date. It perfectly captures our fear of something horrible happening out of the blue, and provides a sweet revenge fantasy, in which we retaliate on an even grander scale than we were attacked, and in this fantasy, we don't botch the retaliation. It perfectly captured our national mood, and the blood, guts, and gore, far from being gratuitous, served the story well. As the central villain, Vlasak was the calm in the eye of the storm. He could have so easily overplayed his hand, and he didn't. It was a compelling performance in an eminently watchable movie that should not have been so easily dismissed as a fringe/cult/genre picture.

Should not have been nominated: Again, no surprise, Eddie Murphy, for many of the reasons discussed above. It was not a stretch for him by any means, he was really playing himself, and that makes him much more vulnerable than pundits would have you believe.

Screenplay

Both screenplay categories here are pretty tight, with only one glaring mistake.

Best Adapted Screenplay:
Will Win: The Departed. It's a great movie with a lot of love from the Academy. A Scorcese win (not yet a sure thing) could boost it's chances in a few other categories, particularly this one. As with the Original Screenplay, there's a lot of sentiment carrying this one to a win.

Should Win: Notes on a Scandal. Patrick Marber was unfairly ignored for his screenplay for Closer. Scandal was a little more accessible and as such rightly got a nomination. However, it's still seen as a long shot despite it's tight storytelling and compelling characters. He did a great job making two unlikeable women very sympathetic and filling out 90 minutes into a satisfying experience.

Should Have Been Nominated: Tristram Shandy: A Cock and Bull Story. This British import came and went fairly quickly last January. It got a lot of love from critics but lost its audience which was too busy catching up on late release Oscar nominees. It's a terrific adaptation of a book long thought to be unfilmable.

Should Not Have Been Nominated: Borat. . . Come on. It's a reality TV show, and a very unfunny one at that. How this movie found an audience completely baffles me, and its Golden Globe wins are even more mystifying. Let's send this one to the dustbin of film history.

Original Screenplay:
Will Win: Little Miss Sunshine. Babel could upset this contest with it's multiple but deftly managed story lines. However, there's a great love for this movie. It really tapped into a vein, and I think it will hold. A Best Picture win will guarantee this category as well.

Should Win: Little Miss Sunshine. It's a great story, and its snub in the director category requires a win here.

Should Have Been Nominated: While all the nominees in this category are deserving, it would have been nice to see Blood Diamond (I think it was original) nominated as well. It was as good as, although not better than, any of these nominees, and it's omission was probably only by a few votes.

Should Not Have Been Nominated: None. They are all deserving, I can't complain about any of these winning.

Oscar Time

It's that time of year once again. While the Oscars are nowhere near as fun as the Tony awards, they are an important night, and this year, for the first time in a very long time, there is actually a degree of suspense. While some races are locked, some are still wide open (and not just the Best Picture race). Some of the so-called sure things are shakier than you'd think on closer inspection. So, with a cautionary mind of my 1997 predictions (in which, as editor of the entertainment section of my college paper I publically predicted a huge Titanic backlash and only correctly predicted one award - Best Screenplay for Good Will Hunting, with failed predictions for Julianne Moore, Burt Reynolds, Judi Dench, Peter Fonda, Curtis Hanson as director, As Good As It Gets as Best Picture, The Sweet Hereafter as Adapted Screenplay, and Kundun taking most of the technical awards. At least I co-wrote the predictions with my second-in-command and she agreed with me on all but Burt Reynolds), I offer my takes on the major categories.

Tuesday, February 20, 2007

He's Here, again

Why, oh why? I thought this horrible idea was finally put to rest in the mid-90's. Andrew Lloyd Webber announced today that he is reviving his idea for a Phantom sequel. For a man who defined contemporary musical theatre in the 70's and 80's, he shows no regard for theatre history. If there is a successful musical sequel out there, I am unaware of it. Let 'Em Eat Cake, Bring Back Birdie, and Annie Warbucks were all horrendous artistic and commercial disasters. Given Lloyd Webber's post-Phantom track record, does he really want to enter this risky territory? I don't care what great idea was pitched to him, there is no conceivable story that would serve as a suitable sequel. Presumably the Phantom died at the end. If he didn't, and he goes after Christine again, it completely negates his change of heart and the humanity he acquired at the end of the first show. If it's an imposter phantom, why should we care? I just don't see what he could accomplish by tackling this project. If there was a worthy sequel idea, wouldn't Gaston Leroux have written it first? Granted, his story was more of a detective story along the lines of Sherlock Holmes, the romance was added by future screenwriters and became part of the Phantom lore, and it was only natural that someone would have sooner or later focused on that story line to create a musical, but if there was a profitable way to resurrect the Phantom, wouldn't he have done it? Let this idea rest in peace and try finding an original idea for a real comeback.

The Real Dreamgirls

A few weeks ago I read a DVD review in Entertainment Weekly of a movie I had never heard of called Sparkle. It was described as the "original" Dreamgirls and the review was very positive (an overal score of A-). I decided to check it out and put it at the top of my queue. However, I must not have been the only one to be impressed because it had a very long wait, and now, about six weeks later, it still has a long wait. I figured I was going to end up buying it anyways since one of the bonus features was the soundtrack CD, so after getting a coupon from Best Buy last Thursday, I stopped in after work on Friday and picked it up. Due to my busy weekend, I didn't get around to watching it until last night, but what a great movie it turned out to be. It's not a musical, but rather a drama with music (similar to Walk The Line, Ray, The Rose, Beaches, For The Boys, and Judy's A Star Is Born, all shows that routinely end up filed under Musicals even though no one spontaneously bursts into song while walking down the street, a more elaborate post on this is coming in the near future). The music though, written by Curtis Mayfield, is top notch and while I am a huge fan of the Dreamgirls score, is much more authentic. The movie was obviously low budget (cheap sets and lots of wide angles), but that added to the grittiness and realism of the movie. I really believed these characters were from the housing projects in Harlem, while Beyonce and company looked like they just stepped out of Ebony into downtown Detroit. While the script wasn't perfect (Sister's tragic descent is way too fast and the happy ending is somewhat unearned), it hit the right notes way more often than not, and I was extremely surprised during the opening credits by seeing Joel Schumacher as the sole credited writer. While he didn't direct, he obviously had a feel for a musical story, which begs the question, what the hell happened to fuck up the Phantom movie so badly? For everyone who thinks Dreamgirls the movie is the hippest thing since Chicago (a fantastic cinematic adaption that completely outclasses Dreamgirls), pick up the Dreamgirls Broadway recording and the Sparkle DVD. It'll make for a great night of entertainment.

Monday, February 19, 2007

No Florida Repeat This Time

So after last week's improvised elimination, I eagerly tuned in to Grease this week to see how things would shake out. As usual, the production opened with a group number, and this one did seem to truly be a group song, not like last week's tag-team performance. However, while I have no idea what song it was, it was really awful, and what is up with Max's performance faces? He's like Clay Aiken was early in Idol's season 2, where he thinks he's being sexy or dramatic, but really has no idea how ridiculous he looks. Fortunately, the horror didn't last too long and they got on to the elimination. Apparently "millions" of votes were cast, which is odd since the show is only registering a couple million viewers. Anyways, it was announced that once again there would indeed be a sing-off, but now we were informed that once we make it through the semi-finals, the audience's vote would indeed count for something. However, they did not say at what point the semi-finals would be considered over. Then, in a very bizarre and poorly paced announcement, it was revealed that once again, Jason was one of the lowest vote getters, joined by Kevin, and on the girls' side, it was Juliana and Kathleen. I was shocked that once again Jason was in the bottom two. I don't understand why he hasn't gone over so well, he was fantastic in Altar Boyz and I think he's a better candidate for Danny than most of the guys (except Austin of course). Kathleen was also puzzling. I thought several of the girls did much worse, particularly Ashley. For some reason she just rubs me the wrong way and that bitch needs to go. I was only mildly surprised by Kevin's showing. While his performance wasn't awful, he had the misfortune to follow Derek and suffered by comparison. I was not surprised at all by Juliana. She made the biggest gamble of the night last week and did not pull it off in the slightest, she deserved her spot here. We then got another bizarre surprise; this week's guest judge was Jon Secada. Does anyone care about him anymore? I thought he faded in 1995 just as quickly as he hit the national consciousness in 1994. Really, next time let's make sure we get a judge that actually has something relevant to say. This week, we then got the sing-off first thing. Sure enough, it was announced that Jason and Juliana were the lowest vote getters, and with that confidence-shaking announcement, they were turned loose to sing, and this time they were indeed the ones sent home. Then, finally, 20 minutes into the one-hour show, we got to the performances. The theme of the night was duets. One guy and one girl were paired up to do a number, but the voting was still for individual performers. However, we were back to the anything goes music selection. No Broadway songs tonight. You would think that since they're auditioning for a Broadway show instead of a Las Vegas revue, the judges would want to hear how well they can handle the genre. Imagine Austin and Kathleen doing "A Little Priest" or Chad and Kate doing "Barcelona" or Derek and Allie doing "As Long As You're Mine." Any of those would have been so much better than the drek that filled most of last night's performances.

First up was Chad and Allie doing Ain't No Mountain High Enough. Since this song is normally a solo, they did it in the tag-team style and it did not work at all. Chad must still be recovering from the flu, and it's going to hurt him. He still looked oh so good (and trust me, nothing would keep me from him should he call), but all he did was growl off key through his lyrics. For the first half of the song they symbolically stayed on opposite sides of the stage, but about halfway through began a surreal dry humping dance while screaming their lyrics. It was not pretty, and would have been much more believable if it had been Chad and Max dry humping. Allie's vocals were good, it's too bad Chad didn't give her more to play off of. I'm finally starting to see what the judges have been talking about. If she can stay consistent, and show better choice in material, she could be the one to beat.

Next was Austin and Laura singing I Don't Know Much, and it sizzled. They worked so well together and sounded fantastic. It was the high point of the night. They each showed that they can work well with others while really highlighting their own talents. Great job for both of them. Austin is still the Danny to beat, and Laura finally got herself on the radar.

Next was Max and Ashley doing It Takes Two, and, as it was also a real duet, it was the only other great performance of the night. While Ashley still was not as confident as she needs to be, her vocals were marginally better than they have been, although still nowhere near what they should be. Max, however, was the star of the night. He moved and sang with pure confidence and hit all his notes. He really came alive with this performance and any doubts about his ability to play Danny evaporated. My only concern is the faces that he makes. He needs to take a cue from Clay and start rehearsing in front of a mirror. Lose the sex face and the competition could be his.

The last performance by a non-bottom four pairing was Derek and Kate singing From This Moment On. While the song is technically a duet on the album, Shania's single and radio version of the song is a solo, and this was the rendition they gave, doing it in the tag-team style and it was a disaster. Any progress Derek made towards upstaging Austin last week is gone. His first notes were way off key, and all four of the judges nailed him on it. He managed to recover, but his confidence was gone and the song, performed at about half the tempo of Shania's version, was an unmitigated bore. Neither Derek nor Kate could sustain or project any long notes, they simply faded out numerous times, which is especially surprising for Kate who has so far built her reputation on belting out the high notes. This was a major step backwards for both of them and I expect to see them both in the bottom four next week.

The evening ended with our near-misses Kevin and Kathleen. They did Something To Talk About, another solo song done in the tag team style, and this was not something anyone is going to want to talk about again. Kathleen was obviously shaken up by her brush with elimination and could not hit a note in tune to save her life. Kevin did not do much better himself even though he took the lion's share of the lines, giving Kathleen only a few seconds to sell herself. Their choice of staging also kept them on opposite sides of the stage for the entire song with no interaction, showing zero chemistry with each other. Not a smart move when the judges have stressed that interaction with the other lead is just as important as individual performance. If they find themselves in the bottom four again, the judges are going to remember this and save performers that work well with their partners. Not good.

We then got a brief recap and the announcement that next week's guest judge will be Frankie Avalon. First on that, they cancel the show for the Superbowl but are going to run it during the Oscars? They really don't know their audience, do they? So, my commentary on next week's show is going to be much delayed since Bravo isn't airing a repeat of it until next Thursday. Second, they're running out of time to call me to be a guest judge. They need to get on that as I'm not going to be available every weekend, so if this is going to work, we need to start making arrangements now. No word on what next week's theme is going to be, or on why they are insisting on sticking with the horribly manufactured, cringe-inducing nicknames they've stuck each contestant with. Let the fans speak for themselves. So, look for my recap next Friday or Saturday, and hopefully I'll be able to write a future post from the vantage point of the judge's podium.

A good year for nuns

2007 is shaping up to be a good year for nuns. First we had the superb Doubt, and on Saturday I saw the Lyric Opera's premiere production of Dialogues of the Carmelites. It was definitely the jewel in the Lyric's best year in a long time. The staging was similar to this season's earlier production of Iphigenie en Tauride, but not quite as gimmicky. All the performers were superb and the orchestra was wonderful. My only quibble is with the Twyla Tharp stylings of the final scene, but it still worked. The Lyric has more than made up for ignoring this opera for the past 50 years.

Spamalot shut out

It was a busy weekend for me, and I promise I'll write about it, and give my analysis of this week's Grease, but I'm stuck with a surprise meeting this morning that is demanding most of my time, so all that will come a little bit later. I did want to point out quickly, that Spamalot was fortunately shut out of last night's Olivier Awards. The big winner was Sunday in the Park with George. A list of all the winners can be seen here. I was surprised that Caroline or Change won the best new musical award, beating out both Avenue Q and Spamalot, but the Brits definitely have very different taste. On a related note, I'll be in London for one day later this year, and I hope to see Billy Elliot. Tickets are on sale through about 2 weeks before I'll be there. Hopefully it will get extended and as soon as a new block of tix go on sale I can get a pair.

Thursday, February 15, 2007

Something To Look Forward To

As I am sitting here buried in snow, I've got my upcoming Vegas trip to look forward to. I just ordered my Phantom tickets for Friday night, March 30 at 7:00. We're in the second row, I believe one seat off the aisle. I usually prefer to sit in the middle of the main floor for Phantom so I can see the entire chandelier fall, but the Venetian's ticketing site was not being cooperative. I could either get these seats or seats way off to the side, and probably limited view. So, I figured since we're going all out for this weekend, I might as well get the best available and went for the second row. I had second row seats for Avenue Q at the Wynn last year and they were really nice, hopefully these will be the same.

Wednesday, February 14, 2007

Match point already?

I was very excited to get an email yesterday from playbill.com with a subject line promising a terrific offer on Deuce. I opened it up and was initially extremely happy to find a discount of 50% on tickets. I am really excited about this show and the discount will help save money for a nice dinner at Aquavit after. Then I realized though, why are they already offering a 50% discount two months before the show even opens? I rarely get offers for 50% off tickets, and the shows that usually offer it are either ones that have been running for years or are on the brink of closing. Is there really that little interest in Deuce, and if so, why? It's Angela Lansbury's return to Broadway after more than 20 years people!!! She's the only actress (that I know of anyways) that's had multiple Tony nominations and won every single one. She was Mrs. Lovett, Mama Rose, Jessica Fletcher, Mrs. 'Arris, Mrs. Potts, and the creepy maid in Gaslight, and then there was The Manchurian Candidate (bad movie, great performance). Again, come on people. Then on top of that, Terrance McNally is rarely less than good, and he's been on quite a run lately. I guess in the age of Jersey Boys, there's little interest in real theatre and true talent. It's the audience's loss. At least this means that whenever I end up being able to go to New York, there will be tickets for me.

Tuesday, February 13, 2007

Coalhouse Lives Again

Woo Hoo! Ragtime is on its way back!!! One of the greatest shows of the 20th century that didn't get it's full due the first time around now gets a second life. In hindsight, Ragtime really should have won Best Musical at the 1998 Tony Awards ceremony. For all it's visual glory, The Lion King just hasn't cut it. The new songs suck (hence Ragtime winning the Tony for Best Score), it is way too long (twice the length of the movie, mostly due to padding with the sucky new songs, which taxes kiddies' attention spans, as well as my own), and it just really doesn't have much to say. After seeing it once, I felt like I never really needed to see it again. Ragtime on the other hand has a glorious score, is completely relevant, and even though the first act is almost two hours, the show flies by. I caught the touring production in 1998 and then it was gone until Light Opera Works in Evanston did a fantastic production in 2003 that rivaled the Broadway production. I'm glad it's finally getting another chance. I am a little worried though that it's being done by an opera company. Opera performers generally do not have the style or understanding of musicals to be able to do a Broadway show. The Lyric Opera's production of Sweeney Todd in 2002 was a disasater. It plodded along, any necessary vocal subtlties were lost in the singers' operatic affectations, and there was no sense of drama. Many Rogers & Hammerstein shows have met similar fates, as has West Side Story. The fact that they need to have supertitles already indicates that they're looking for operatic singers rather than Broadway singers, which has me worried. A show like this really needs to right performers to pull it off. At least there's a silver lining no matter how the production team procedes: even if the production is lackluster, if it pulls in an audience it may convince other, more theatrically-oriented companies, to give this masterpiece a second look.

Monday, February 12, 2007

Hit The Mute Button

The Oscars have always been known for ridiculous music production numbers, but this year is taking the cake. Expanding on her dismal renditions of all the best song nominees from two years ago, Beyonce is returning to perform, along with Jennifer and Anika. While I really don't have a problem with Anika (she is an actual Broadway performer after all), all this Dreamgirls hype is driving me nuts. Thank god for Tivo. I can wait until two hours after the ceremony starts and then begin watching, fast forward through all the crap, and catch up to real time just as everything wraps up. Should have done it last year, will definitely be doing it this year.

And Now The Grammy's Are Irrelevant

Ok, so the Grammy's have been irrelevant longer than the Oscars and Tonys put together, but last night's Best Show Recording award put another nail in their coffin. Jersey Boys won the award, beating out The Color Purple (no problem with that one), The Drowsey Chaperone (adding insult to injury, at least Wicked was able to snag this award after it's disappointing loss to Avenue Q at the Tonys), The Pajama Game (again, no problem with this one) and, worst of all, Sweeney Todd. Now, to start with, what's up with these nominees? I'm not sure what the rules are, but the cast recordings of See What I Wanna See, Thrill Me, and Grey Gardens all came out during the eligibility period, and any of them are much more worthy of a nomination than Color Purple and Pajama Game (and Jersey Boys for that matter). Are Off-Broadway shows ineligible? If so, why? Given that the two biggest shows on Broadway this season came from Off-Broadway, the distinction is becoming less and less important. And even if that is the case, we still had the Broadway cast recordings of A Chorus Line (I know, there's issues with that among the die-hards but it's still preferable to Purple, Pajama, and Jersey) and Tarzan (ditto), and the official US release of Billy Elliot (the best cast album since the London recording of Les Miz). It's just another kick in the gentles for The Drowsey Chaperone and Sweeney Todd. Good taste is gone.

What To Do?

I just read that the producers of Grey Gardens are going to phase out the Off-Broadway Cast Recording (glad I nabbed it while I had the chance) and replacing it with a Broadway Cast Recording. This new recording will incorporate the new songs written for the Broadway production and have a new booklet. While it would be nice to have the "definitive" version, most Broadway CD's are not available at discounted online retailers and need to be purchased for full (ie inflated) price at Border's. It would be nice if they could also put out a sampler CD for $6.99 or so with only the new songs so that those of us who already shelled out almost $20 for the Off-Broadway CD could get just get the new songs on a disc and program our CD players for whichever version we prefer to hear. Given the slow rate at which the local librarys stock new CD's and the dearth of Broadway albums on most online music sites, I'm in a quandry as to what to do. I guess I'll have to see the show first and then decide if the new songs are worth having.

The One The Producers Want

Ok, good morning. I decided to forgive Grease. . . and settled in for the next installment last night, and wow, my inner conspiracy theorist has been in a state of perpetual buzz ever since. The show opened with no apology or explanation for last week's repeat and no explanation of what happened to any votes that may have been phoned in last week. We got a quick greeting from Billy and Denise, channeling Ryan Seacrest and Brian what's his name at their best. We then got another group performance of Summer Nights with marginally better choreography, but since the song is really one male and one female performer with a chorus, it was done in a tag-team style, with each contestant getting to sing one line and then passing the mic on, which just doesn't work very well. What's going to happen when they get to Hopelessly Devoted? Then, we got the first bombshell of the night. Two weeks ago during the live episode, Billy and Denise repeatedly said that viewer's votes would determine who would be sent home. Well, last night, they announced that the two lowest male and female vote getters would have a sing-off and the judges would decide who got sent home. Obviously, something very unexpected had happened with the voting. Did my Austin actually get the lowest number of votes? Could Matt still somehow be in the competition? A very awkward, apparently improvised, redesign of Idol's results show followed in which we eventually found out that while Matt was indeed one of the lowest vote getters, Jason was also one of the two lowest, which was quite a surprise. No surprise for the girls though, it was Allie and Ashley (the ringer Ashley brought back last week, not the Lindsey Lohan lookalike Ashley). Obviously when the votes were counted two weeks ago, Jason must have been the lowest (and it was later confirmed that he was), and in order to save the show's credibility, the producers took last week off to figure out how to re-jigger the show and throw the results to keep Jason in the running, hence this week's previously unannounced sing-off. The unlucky four were shepherded off the stage cloaked in shame and the remaining ten proceeded to perform, apparently in reverse order of most votes gotten.

Now, apparently, someone is reading my posts, because it was revealed that these contestants for a Broadway show would actually be singing Broadway songs. Imagine that. We were then quickly introduced to guest judge Andrew Lloyd Webber, and while the more cynical among us could assume that bringing The Woman In White to Broadway drained all his finances and he now needs to slum for the highest bidder, he actually has a history with the show, having produced the British version with judge David Ian, which last year cast The Sound of Music and this year is casting his own Joseph and the Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat. Plus, once upon a time, he did know what he was doing creating musicals, so it can be assumed that he mostly knows of what he speaks.

Max then kicked off the performances with Can You Feel The Love Tonight from The Lion King. However, any notion that this was a theatre oriented show quickly evaporated as the orchestra began turning out the movie's orchestration rather than the Broadway adaptation. While much of the post-performance critique focused on Max's much ballyhooed, but rather low-key make-over (really, all they did was slightly trim his hair), he was a thousand times better than he was last week. Yes, there were still some wrong notes, and trust me, theatre-goers who are paying $111 plus service fees for their tickets are not going to be as forgiving as the studio audience, but he really sold the song, far better than he did last week. I'll feel his love any night he wants.

Laura was up next with Superstar from Jesus Christ Superstar, and Jesus Christ is right. Her first two shrieky notes were horribly off key. She recovered well, but it was really a karaoke performance. She couldn't find the passion behind the words, and with showtunes more than any other type of music, that is key. This unfortunately seemed to be a theme among the girls for the night, in a week that once again saw the initially unmemorable guys giving superior performances than the fading divas.

Derek gave probably the riskiest performance of the night, performing Footloose from the musical of the same name, and it paid off. First of all, of all the shows I have ever seen, Footloose The Musical is by far the worst. What the hell was Walter Bobby thinking, going from Chicago to Footloose? His career has been paying for it since. I only saw it because it was part of my Broadway in Chicago subscription package and I like to think that it was the free one, because I would never pay money to see something that putrid. Derek however, could have saved the show had he been in it. He gave a great performance, full of energy without going over the top which would have been so easy to do. He worked in some great dance moves as well and while Austin is still the one to beat, Derek put him on notice that he could just as easily take this competition.

Ashley then performed Take That Look Off Your Face from Tell Me On A Sunday/Song & Dance, and honey, all I can say is, take that performer off the stage. It was not good. Again, she focused too much on the notes (without a lot of success) and completely ignored any emotion behind the lyrics. Listen to Bernadette Peters on the Song & Dance recording and you'll hear exactly how this song should be sung. Fortunately, for once, the judges actually provided real criticism and took her to task for her lackluster performance.

Kevin followed in Derek's footsteps with another song from a widely panned show that quickly came and went, performing Burning Love from All Shook Up. While he was good, he was not as successful as Derek at making us forget the stench of the original. While he hit the notes better than any of the girls, his was the most karaoke-like performance of any of the guys.

Then, Juliana did Don't Cry For Me Argentina. Oh, Honey, what on earth possessed you to choose this one? This is probably the most iconic showtune ever and if you're not Patti, it's not going to work for you (although Karen Carpenter gave a remarkably assured performance of it on the Carpenter's 1978 album Passage, track it down, it puts Madonna to shame). Sure enough, I was crying for Juliana. While she effectively, if in a slightly campy way, used the balcony to give her performance some theatricality, the song landed with a thud. Out of tune and with no conviction, this was probably the biggest disaster of the night.

We then got a break from the performers for a short interview with Andrew Lloyd Webber and some clips of the group rehearsing with him. While Mr. Lloyd Webber has written some good shows, he is decidedly populist (which does happen to be the point of Grease), and I got to wondering what would happen if the producers could land Stephen Sondheim as a guest judge. Imagine Kathleen belting out The Miller's Song or Chad crooning Johanna. If they could rise to the occasion, that would be a show. We then got a bizarre group performance of The Phantom of the Opera from the show of the same name. It was again done in the tag-team performance style, and at a much slower tempo than in the real show, so the group resembled less a troupe of reality show contestants and more a band of zombies. Back to the drawing board for next week.

After this odd interlude, we got Chad, with another song from a horrid, although this time inexplicably popular, musical, with My Eyes Adored You from Jersey Boys. He explained ahead of time that he was still recovering from the flu, and it showed. While it wasn't a great performance, it did allow him to show off his ability to capture the flavor of Grease's (for once I'm referring to the actual Broadway show) time period, and he looked so good in close up. My eyes are adoring him, although I think he'd be much better suited to Fiyero than Danny.

Kate, last week's best performer, also chose to plunder Evita, at which point I noticed that all the girls doing Lloyd Webber songs were choosing his early songs. No one seemed interested in trying their hand at Let Us Love In Peace, I Believe My Heart, or All The Wasted Time, which are just as good as any of Andrew's earlier works. Kate did Buenos Aires, a very interesting choice, and while she fumbled through most of it, she nailed the end. Unfortunately, Broadway audiences are not paying just to hear the end of the songs performed well. It was another unfortunate choice from a show that really should be left alone by amateurs.

Austin had probably the best choice, Ease on Down the Road from The Wiz. An old, somewhat forgotten, but still respected show like this allows for a good performer to make a song his own and avoid comparisons to the original, and that is exactly what Austin did. He is still the one to beat, singing and dancing to perfection. I saw Diana Ross do this one in concert a couple of years ago, and while the devout, hard core Ross-head audience went nuts when she did it, it was nothing compared to the reception Austin got. Well done.

Last of the top ten was Kathleen, with another risky choice, Memory from Cats. While it is not as iconic as Don't Cry For Me, it is probably Lloyd Webber's most well known song, and one of the best known showtunes, period. Fortunately, enough artists have covered it that there really is no "definitive" version, which in that respect, made it an easier song than either of the Evita songs previously performed. No worries for Kathleen though, she nailed it with what was until that point the best female performance of the night, and ended up being the second best female performance of the night once all was said and done. In my opinion, she's probably the best choice for Sandy at this point.

Then we got to the singoff, and the conspiracy theories really started flowing. Billy announced that indeed, if they were going to send the lowest vote getters home, it would have been Jason (again, how?) and Allie (no surprise there). The shameful four then had to do a tag-team performance of Tears on My Pillow and the judges announced that they were saving Jason and Allie, sending Matt and Ashley home. While I am glad that Jason is still around, I thought that the votes were supposed to determine who got sent home, not a meddling group of judges with a vested interest in the outcome. This is how we ended up with Bush as president, and do we really want another repeat of that experience? So, in the end, it was the second lowest vote getters that got sent home, which could be false advertising or breach of contract, and, as they were also both the ringers that got a second chance last week, we are now, three weeks later, back to the same point we were at at the end of the last semi-final episode. Kind of a waste of time if you ask me, but at least from here on out the competition is between people who actually earned their places. I wonder if there's going to be any more sing-offs.

The saved contestants then got to do their performances. Jason did the only non-showtune number of the night, singing Buddy Holly's That'll Be The Day. It was an interesting choice, I would have thought he'd want to show how well he could do a Broadway song since he's auditioning for a Broadway show, but like Chad, it allowed him to try to break away from the contemporary mold he's cast himself in (and may have been responsible for his poor showing in the voting) and do a song from Grease's time period. It worked ok, and I do think that some of the judges were a bit unduly harsh in their criticism. Kathleen for once was right on the money with her critique and I'm not sure what Andrew was trying to say, but it appears he landed on the good side when he wrapped up.

Allie then gave us the biggest surprise of the night. She sang I Don't Know How To Love Him from Jesus Christ Superstar (cementing the Lloyd Webber picks from his 70's era) and gave the best female performance of the night. What a transformation. She hit all the notes and was the only female to find the emotion behind the words. I finally saw what Kathleen was talking about, but the question is, can she consistently give this kind of performance? I hope so because if she can, she'll go far.

We then got a quick re-cap (and again, they showed Kate's rehearsal take in which she hit the wrong notes instead of her live take in which she got them right) and then Matt and Allie got a duet in which to sing good bye. No mention of who next week's guest judge will be. I'll be sitting by my phone waiting for the call. Again, this episode felt somewhat bloated, and there were many awkward moments as they either needed to fill time or cut time. I believe next week is down to an hour, so it should be tighter as there are still 12 contestants to perform. Will there be a singoff? We'll have to wait and see. If not, Matt and Ashley have a lot to cry foul about and the credibility of the show will be as permanently tattered as Florida's board of elections. And, let's dump the nicknames, please.

Wednesday, February 07, 2007

Recent Acquisitions and Upcoming Events

It's been a while since I've posted an update, and given my relative lack of interest in recent articles on playbill (although I was saddened to hear that The Vertical Hour is closing 3 weeks early, diminishing my chances of seeing it, but I'm glad that it's closing in the black).

Recent Acquisitions:
Baker Street
Frankenstein: The Musical
Oklahoma! (1966 Studio Cast Recording)

On a recent trip to the library I picked up:
Mamma Mia!
Of Thee I Sing/Let 'em Eat Cake
Kiss Me Kate (1948 Original Broadway Cast Recording)
South Pacific (Original Broadway Cast Recording, after hearing this I'm on the fence about which disc I prefer more, the 1988 studio cast or this one)
Damn Yankees (1994 Broadway Revivial Cast Recording)

Upcoming Events:
Dialogues of the Carmelites (Lyric Opera, February 17)
Legends! (LaSalle Bank Theatre, February 24)
Music of the Baroque (Harris Theatre, February 27)
My Chemical Romance (ok, not technically theatre but they are very dramatic and got Liza to do a guest vocal on their most recent CD, Allstate Arena March 1)
Linda Eder (Palace Theatre, March 3)
Cosi Fan Tuti (Lyric Opera, March 4)
Phantom Las Vegas (Venetian, March 30)
Liza Minnelli (Luxor, March 31)

And hopefully, sometime this month I would like to see the new musical Adding Machine at Noyes Theatre in Evanston. It's gotten raves and it would be nice to be able to say I was there at the beginning.

Monday, February 05, 2007

Super Bowl Suckiness

Well, what a week it's been. First, you may have noticed a lack of recent posts. It's not because there's nothing worth writing about for the past week, but it has been so goddam motherfucking cold, I've been in virtual hibernation since early last week. I swear the cold is sapping all my energy. I can barely make it out of bed, get to work, get home, and crawl back into bed. There is just no excuse for this cold. I'm actually kind of glad now that my New York trip isn't happening, I'd be stuck walking around the city for about 8 hours and it's even colder there than here. I'd end up in a homeless shelter just to get warm. So, last night, I finally crawled out of hibernation for the next installment of Grease and my weekend went from bad to worse.

Now, to start with, I swear that when I watched Grease (in order to help keep my sanity, I'm not typing in "You're The One That I Want" every time, just understand that when I say Grease, I'm really talking about the reality show on TV and not the stupid ass movie) last week, Billy and what's-her-name referred to "next week" several times. I took that to mean that there would be a new live show this weekend. Now, to understand where I'm about to go, you need to understand that I FUCKING HATE FOOTBALL. I hate all sports, but football is particularly egregious, partly because for most of the fall season, it fucks up all my Sunday night shows. The games are incapable of ending on time, so shows that start immediately after get pre-empted or we only get to see the last 2 minutes, and it drives me fucking nuts. Then there's the Superbowl. Granted, I am from Chicago, but that in no way gave me any desire to watch the Superbowl, and I am so fucking happy that the goddam Bears lost; while it won't end the craziness, it at least limits it. So, I will happily tune in to just about any type of counter-programming and I thought Grease would really be the ticket. I mean, come on, do the producers of Grease really think that their core audience would desert them for a sporting event? Not this queen. I'd Tivo it and watch it twice. And, on another side note, in recent years, Chicago has hosted more shows that have gone on to major Tony Award wins (The Producers, Light in the Piazza, Spamalot, Aida, Movin' Out) than we've had winning sports teams, and yet, there has never been a city-wide craze over the Tony Awards, even when The Producers, which had its world premiere in Chicago, swept the awards and set a new record. Granted, most of the masses don't have any culture and wouldn't understand a Tony Awards party, but it also shows a short sightedness on the part of our civic leaders. They love the money that theatre-related tourism brings in but don't care enough about theatre itself to do anything to celebrate it. So, back to my original point, I turned on the TV at 6 and found a re-run of the New York auditions. I figured, ok, it must be an hour show this week since they don't need quite so much padding now that we've seen all the contestants' introductory home movies. So, I flipped back to a movie I was watching and turned back at 7, expecting a live show. Nope, I got a rerun of the Grease Academy episode. So, I figured maybe it would be on at 8. Again, Nope, we got a rerun of last week's live show, and I'm a little confused first of all as to why, and second of all, what that means for the vote totals. If the producer's aren't going to count votes from the rerun, why bother re-running it? And, if they are going to count the votes from last night's show, they should have said something last week instead of telling us that "next week" we would find out the results. So, I checked the Tivo's built in guide, and sure enough, it looks like next Sunday (which would actually be "two weeks" from last week's live show) is when we finally get the results and get the next competition. What the fuck??? Please tell me they didn't cave to the Superbowl as well. That completely goes against everything theatre should stand for. I'm already on the fence about the show after last week's mediocre performances and I've lost even more respect for it now. Just ask American Idol what happens when I'm over a show (seriously, any show that would let a Taylor Hicks make it past the first round of auditions, much less let him win the fucking thing should be banned by the FCC on grounds of good taste). If the producers of Grease would like to make it up to me, I would be more than happy to be a guest judge on a future episode. Seriously, why haven't I been asked yet? So, we'll see next week if I feel like watching, and if I do, look for a recap next Monday.